Legal Opinion
Mandeng v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 25, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2024-3488Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JONATHAN CAMILLE MANDENG, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 24-3488 (JDB) UBER COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Jonathan Camille Mandeng, a former driver for the rideshare company Uber, sued Uber in D.C. Superior Court. After removing the action to this Court, Uber moves to compel arbitration on the basis of an arbitration agreement Mandeng signed as part of his employment. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants the motion. Background Mandeng filed this complaint pro se in D.C. Superior Court. See Compl. [ECF No.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Smith v. SpizzirriSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
- Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Coinbase v. SuskiSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.