Legal Opinion

Arigna Technology Limited v. Porsche AG

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided October 6, 2023No. 2:21-cv-00173Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ARIGNA TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-CV-00173-JRG § BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG, § § Defendants. § § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Bayerische Moteren Werke AG’s (“BMW”) Motion to Dismiss (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 64.) In the Motion, BMW moves this Court to dismiss Plaintiff Arigna Technology Limited’s (“Arigna”) First Amended Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), 12(b)(5), 12(b)(6), and 12(b)(7). Having considered the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Lone Star Fund v (U.S.), L.P. v. Barclays Bank PLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API