Legal Opinion · Dissent

Berry v. Allgood

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 19, 1984No. 65719Published

1DissentRendlen, Chief Justice

It is difficult not to say the juror misconduct in this case requires a new trial. The facts are these: In a malpractice suit against five physicians, several of the defendants, including Doctors Murphy and Dorton, had testified. Their appearance in court had not only alerted the jurors as to who they were, but by taking the stand and testifying they re-enforced the jurors’ knowledge of their presence, specifics of their background, and something of their personalities.

Five days of court ensued with repeated MAI 2.01 admonitions to the jurors not to comment on or discuss the case and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Middleton v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  3. California Fruit Exchange v. HenryDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Riley v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Printed Terry Finishing Co. v. City of LebanonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API