Legal Opinion
United States v. British American Tobacco Australia Services, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 17, 2006No. 04-5358, 05-5129PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.
SENTELLE, Circuit Judge.
Intervenor British American Tobacco Australia Services, Ltd. (“BATAS”) appeals from two orders of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. First, BATAS appeals from Order # 670, which denied its motion for expanded intervention as untimely. Second, BATAS appeals from Order # 896, which overruled certain trial testimony objections made by British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd. (“BATCo”). Because the District Court did not abuse its discretion by finding BATAS’s motion for intervention…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Wyoming Outdoor Council v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, Mike Trbovich v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Khadr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- R & G Mortgage Corp. v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Karsner v. LothianCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Utility Water Act Group v. PerciasepeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Amador County v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.