Legal Opinion

State v. Tawney

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1910No. 17,051PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Franklin district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

For a statement of the facts in this case see The State v. Tawney, 78 Kan. 855, and 81 Kan. 162. We find no error in the ruling of the court denying a change of venue. As to the first ground, there was sufficient rebutting evidence in thé form of affidavits to warrant a finding that there existed no such prejudice in the community as would prevent the appellant from having a fair trial. The court doubtless took into consideration the fact that Franklin is a large, populous county, and that little difficulty would be experienced in finding…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BohanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. State v. TawneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. State v. HinkleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. State v. KnadlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  5. State v. TawneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  3. State v. ElftmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  4. State v. KagiSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API