Legal Opinion

State v. Tawney

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 7, 1908No. 15,896PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Franklin district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The appellant was convicted of the larceny of two pigs. He assigns several errors, but relies largely upon the claim that there was an abuse of discretion by the trial court in permitting the county attorney on the cross-examination of the defendant and the defendant’s wife to ask questions which tended to degrade the witnesses, but at the time this occurred it was not considered of sufficient importance to challenge the court’s attention to the matter by an objection or motion. The wife was a very material witness and the story she…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. AbbottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. State v. PotterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  3. State v. PughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. Taylor v. ClendeningSupreme Court of Kansas · 1868
  5. In re SwartzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HammonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Spain v. RakestrawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. State v. GraySupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. State v. TawneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. Zeigler v. Oil Country Specialties Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API