Legal Opinion
Huhta v. Barnhart
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided May 17, 2004No. 6:02-cv-06089PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Robert L. Huhta, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) that he is not disabled under the Social Security Act, and therefore, is not entitled to Social Security disability benefits (“SSD”).
This case has a long procedural history that began nine years ago. Plaintiff originally applied for SSD benefits on July 27, 1995. (Tr. 151, 210). 1 He listed a disability onset date of April 1, 1995, (Tr. 203), but later amended the onset date…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Ronald E. Veino, Sr. v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Balodis v. LeavittDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Colegrove v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- Orr v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- Sublette v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2012
- Poczciwinski v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.