Legal Opinion
Cummings v. Shorey
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided November 16, 2000No. 99-117-AppealPublished
1Opinion of the Court
761 A.2d 680 (2000)
Carol A. CUMMINGS
v.
William H. SHOREY, in his capacity as Tax Assessor for the Town of Middletown.
No. 99-117-Appeal.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island.
November 16, 2000.
Present WEISBERGER, C.J., LEDERBERG, BOURCIER, and GOLDBERG, JJ.
Joseph R. Palumbo, Jr., Middletown, For plaintiff.
Turner C. Scott, For defendant.
OPINION
LEDERBERG, Justice.
The plaintiff, Carol A. Cummings, appealed to the Rhode Island Supreme Court after her dispute over real estate taxes resulted in a judgment in favor of William H. Shorey (tax assessor or defendant), in his capacity as tax assessor of Middletown,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Accent Store Design, Inc. v. Marathon House, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Rhode Island Ophthalmological Society v. CannonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
- State v. DiCiccoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
- In Re DenisewichSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.