Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Mundy

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1892PublishedCited by 21 opinions

cited Wap. Att. 36-38; 31 W. Va. 392; Dan. Att. §§ 268, 270; 30 Gratt. 718. cited 28 Ga. 27; 30 Gratt. 718.

1Opinion of the Court

Lucas, Pebsident :

Tlxe firm of Andrews, Bates & Go., who are plaintiffs in error in this Court, brought an action of assumpsit against J. A. Mundy, Jr., & Co., partners (the firm consisting of J. A. Mundy, Jr., and C. I). Mundy);in the Circuit Court of AVayne county. The service was had upon C. D. Mundy in person, but J. A. Mundy was returned: “blot found.” On the 16th day of January, 1891, the plaintiffs made affidavit and sued out an attachment against the property of. the defendants. The affidavit is as follows :

“State of AVest Virginia, AVayne county, to wit: J oseph A. Lowry, agent for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Delaplain v. ArmstrongWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Layne v. Ohio River R'dWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. White v. TennantWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Wheeling Bridge Co. v. Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Long v. RyanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1878

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bentley v. Standard Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Parker v. National Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Pennington v. GillaspieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Richards v. Riverside Iron WorksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Bice v. Wheeling Electrical Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1907

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API