Legal Opinion

Richards v. Riverside Iron Works

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1904PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Ohio County. Action by H. C. Richards, administrator, against the Riverside Iron Works. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge:

John W. Campbell, the plaintiffs intestate, was before, and on, the 20th day of January, 1899, and also on the 16th day of *512February, 1899, the time of his death, a resident of Bellaire,. in the state of Ohio. For some time previous to the first mentioned date, he had been employed as a general laborer by the-defendant, The Riverside Iron Works, a corporation, at its manufacturing plant in Benwood, Ohio county, West Virginia. A short time before January 20, 1899, a wooden scaffold, consisting of three platforms, had been built by defendant, to-enable its bricklayers to work…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Kerr v. LunsfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  4. Brown's Admr. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
  5. Chicago & Rock Island Railroad v. MorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1861

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Hereford v. MeekWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Bond v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Baldwin v. ButcherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Davis v. PughWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Payne v. KinderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API