International Tobacco Partners, Ltd. v. Beebe
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HENDREN, District Judge.
Now on this 6th day of March, 2006, comes on for consideration Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss (document #21), and from said motion, and the response thereto, the Court finds and orders as follows:
1. Plaintiff asserts antitrust and constitutional challenges to A.C.A. § 26-57-261, as amended by Act 384 of 2005 (the “Escrow Statute”), and to A.C.A. § 26-57-1303(c) (the “Contraband Statute”). Count I of the Amended Complaint alleges that these statutes constitute illegal per se restraints of trade pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1 (the “Sherman Act”). 1 Count II alleges that…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kt & G Corp. v. ATTORNEY GEN. OF STATE OF OKLAHOMACourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Freedom Holdings, Inc. v. CuomoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Godfrey v. State, Department of Community & Economic DevelopmentAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- International Tobacco Partners, Ltd. v. KlineDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Godfrey v. State, Department of Community & Economic DevelopmentAlaska Supreme Court · 2007