Legal Opinion

Seigel v. Solomon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 25, 1967No. 67-491PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION

2Per curiam

This appeal is before the Court on appellants’ motion pursuant to Rule 5.10, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A., to discharge supersedeas bond. The appellants, who were defendants in the trial court, received a jury verdict and final judgment was entered thereon. Thereafter, the trial court on the motion of the plaintiff vacated the final judgment, directed a verdict for the plaintiff on the issue of liability-and granted a new trial for the plaintiff on the issue of damages. The defendant brought an appeal pursuant to Florida Statute 59.04, F.S.A. from the order vacating the final…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thursby v. StewartSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. State v. Florida State Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Florida · 1961

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bowen v. WillardSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Clement v. Aztec Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1974
  3. LaFleur v. Castlewood International CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API