Bowen v. Willard
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
340 So.2d 110 (1976)
Jack H. BOWEN and Michigan Mutual Liability Company, Petitioners
v.
Harvey WILLARD, Respondent.
No. 48429.
Supreme Court of Florida.
November 30, 1976.
Marion R. Shepard and Herbert R. Kanning, of Mathews, Osborne, Ehrlich, McNatt, Gobelman & Cobb, Jacksonville, for petitioners.
S. Perry Penland, Jacksonville, for respondent.
ENGLAND, Justice.
This case is here on the basis of an alleged conflict between a decision on rehearing of the First District Court of Appeal[1] and the decisions of this Court in Leonetti v. Boone, 74 So.2d 551 (Fla. 1954) and Wolfe v. City of Miami, 114 Fla.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- Leonetti v. BooneSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Clement v. Aztec Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Matter of Petition of VermeulenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Wolfe v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Amend. to Fla. Rules of Appellate Proc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Amend. to Fla. Rules of Appellate Proc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Anicet v. GantDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Frazier v. Seaboard System RR, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Mendelson v. MendelsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.