City of St. Paul v. Dual Parking Meter Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentPeterson, Justice
1. I agree that a contractor is not entitled to retain money paid to him for performance of a contract let to him illegally in violation of charter provision requiring that bids be advertised for and that the contract be let to the lowest bidder, where the contractor did not act in “good faith.” But I think, for the reasons stated in my dissent in Kotschevar v. Township of North Fork, 229 Minn. 234, 39 N. W. (2d) 107, that the contractor is not entitled to recover at all in such cases, regardless of whether he acted in “good faith.”
2. In addition, I dissent upon the further and separate…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Jones v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Chippewa Bridge Co. v. City of DurandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Love v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.