Legal Opinion
Rauch v. Himmelberger
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided July 31, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames T. Blair, J.
This is a suit to restrain the president and secretary of the Little River Drainage District (hereinafter referred to as the district) from certifying to the Recorder of Deeds of New Madrid County certain drainage taxes levied upon appellant’s land. Respondents’ demurrer to the petition was sustained. Appellant refused to plead further, judgment went accordingly, and this appeal followed.
The petition is long but, in view of the questions raised here, the facts ruled upon by the trial court in passing on the demurrer can be stated in somewhat briefer form. The district was incorporated in 1907…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Myles Salt Co. v. Board of Comm'rs of Iberia and St. Mary Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Graves v. Little Tarkio Drainage District No. 1Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Ross v. General American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- McDonald v. PritzlIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
- Little River Drainage District v. FriedleinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- Duncan v. St. John Levee & Drainage Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934