Legal Opinion

Little River Drainage District v. Friedlein

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 8, 1942No. Nos. 37847, 37848PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Actions by the Little River Drainage District, a public corporation, (hereinafter designated District) for the collection of delinquent drainage taxes for the year 1938.* The cases were tried to the court, a jury having been waived. They involve like legal issues, except that the answer of Dale B. Perkins and Birdie Perkins presented an additional issue, viz., that they [398] had offered to pay that portion of the bonded indebtedness of the District chargeable against their lands at the time the refunding bonds, hereinafter mentioned, were issued. There was a stipulation for like judgments,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  2. State ex rel. Kochtitzky v. RileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Kochtitzky v. St. Louis, Memphis & Southeastern RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. State Ex Rel. Sturdivant Bank v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  5. McAnally v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dalton v. Fabius River Drainage DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API