Legal Opinion

City of Gary v. McNulty

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1935No. 14,742PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

The appellant appeals from a judgment recovered against it by the appellee for damages sustained on account of personal injuries, suffered by appellee, when he fell upon a defective sidewalk, alleged to have been negligently maintained by appellant.

The errors assigned for reversal are, overruling appellant’s demurrer to appellee’s complaint, and overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.

The complaint contained the usual allegations incorporated in such complaints, where the cause of action is based upon negligence on the part of a city in failing properly to maintain sidewalks in a safe…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of East Chicago v. GilbertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. McComb v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Kenwood Tire Co. v. SpeckmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Indianapolis & Western Railway Co. v. RaganIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Greer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Mills v. American Playground Device Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Aaron v. City of TiptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Hummer v. School City of Hartford CityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Siebeking v. Ford, Admx., Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. City of Gary v. RussellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API