Legal Opinion

Aden v. Fortsh

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 18, 2001Published

1Opinion of the Court

776 A.2d 792 (2001)

169 N.J. 64

Benjamin ADEN and Beatrice Aden, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Robert F. FORTSH, Defendant-Respondent, and

Johl & Company, Inc., Defendant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 8, 2000.

Decided July 18, 2001.

Louis Smith, Burlington, argued the cause for appellants (LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, attorneys).

Jared Stolz, Rahway, argued the cause for respondent (Methfessel & Werbel, attorneys; Jeffrey M. Patti, on the letter in lieu of brief).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by ZAZZALI, J.

The question presented in this appeal is whether a policyholder's failure…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. H. Rosenblum, Inc. v. AdlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. Conklin v. WeismanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. Sears Mortgage Corp. v. RoseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  5. Harr v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API