Legal Opinion
Emil Lawrence v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 3, 1985No. 84-7141PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
I. BACKGROUND
A
Petitioner Emil Lawrence, who is registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“the Commission”) as an associated person (“AP”) of a commodity broker, was a respondent in an earlier Commission enforcement proceeding, In re First Commodity Cory, of Boston, CFTC Docket No. 79-28. On September 3, 1980, Lawrence agreed to a settlement in that proceeding. He consented to findings that he had violated antifraud provisions of the Commodities Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 1-26 (1980) “the Act”, relating to transactions in commodity options, and agreed to pay…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Butz v. Glover Livestock Commission Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Sacks v. Office of Foreign Assets ControlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Brian Monieson v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- First National Monetary Corporation and Michael Bivins v. A.J. Weinberger and Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Bert Dohmen-Ramirez and Wellington Advisory, Inc. v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Ronald HoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- McKeen v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.