State v. Roche
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.
Soon after James Roche and Roy Sweeney were convicted and sentenced for methamphetamine possession, it became public knowledge that Michael Hoover, a chemist at the Washington State Patrol Crime Laboratory, had been self-medicating with heroin sent to the crime lab for testing purposes. Hoover was the chemist who had tested the substances recovered in both Roche’s and Sweeney’s cases and reported them to be methamphetamine. Roche moved for, and was denied, a new trial based on this newly discovered evidence. Sweeney filed a personal restraint petition raising the same issue, after his request…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. SwanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In Re WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- In re the Personal Restraint of WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Coty, Leroy EdwardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- State v. RocheCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. ColquittCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.