Legal Opinion

Manco v. John/Jane Does

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 27, 2010No. 09-3251PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT **

TIMOTHY M. TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.

Darryl Wayne Manco, a Kansas state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings a host of civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Manco’s claims center on his allegation that prison officials implanted a radio frequency device in his body to track his movements and thoughts, among other things. The district court dismissed Man-co’s case as frivolous and denied him leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis.

Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm the district court’s dismissal, find Manco’s appeal frivolous, and assess two…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Allen (ID 79712) v. FacebookDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024
  2. Allen (ID 79712) v. FacebookDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024
  3. Allen (ID 79712) v. FacebookDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024
  4. Cedric A. Gibson v. Municipal City Court, et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026
  5. Cedric A. Gibson v. Municipal City Court, et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API