Legal Opinion

Matthew Marino v. Sinead Marino

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 27, 2020No. 79609-7Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON SINEAD MARINO, No. 79609-7-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. UNPUBLISHED OPINION MATTHEW MARINO, Appellant. CHUN, J. — Six months after their divorce, Sinead Marino petitioned for an order of protection against Matthew Marino,1 claiming that he had been stalking her by using her old phone to access her bank and social media accounts and by hiring a private investigator to follow her. After a hearing where both Sinead and Matthew testified, the trial court entered a stalking order of protection. Matthew appeals, arguing that actions alleged by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of RideoutWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In Re Marriage of RideoutWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In re the Welfare of T.B.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Keene Valley Ventures, Inc. v. City of RichlandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API