Legal Opinion

State ex rel. C.F.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 6, 2019No. DOCKET NOS. A-0326-18T3; A-0329-18T3; A-0330-18T3PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, J.A.D.

*918*136These three appeals, calendared back-to-back and consolidated for purposes of our opinion, require us to decide whether a Family Part judge may divert a delinquency complaint from court action without affording the juvenile offender the opportunity to appear at the hearing. Citing our decision in State in the Interest of N.P.,1 a Family Part judge determined she only was required to notice the State of the hearing. In essence, the judge reasoned requiring juveniles to appear in court for conduct that would constitute disorderly persons offenses under chapter 35 and chapter 36…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Nicholas v. MynsterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  3. In re Return of Weapons to J.W.D.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  4. Luis Perez v. Zagami, LLC (071358)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  5. In Re the Commitment of N.N.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. WALTER J. SOMICK AND ABRAHAM GARCIA (15-07-0107 AND 15-07-0108, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API