Legal Opinion

Casey v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 7, 2020No. 6:19-cv-00843-ACUnknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION SHANNON B. C., Ca se No. 6:19-cv-00843-AC Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. _____________________________________ ACOSTA, Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff Shannon B. C.1 seeks judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application supplemental security income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act,

42 U.S.C. §§ 1381

-1383f. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c)(3). All parties have consented to allow a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API