Casey v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION SHANNON B. C., Ca se No. 6:19-cv-00843-AC Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. _____________________________________ ACOSTA, Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff Shannon B. C.1 seeks judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application supplemental security income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act,
42 U.S.C. §§ 1381
-1383f. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c)(3). All parties have consented to allow a…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.