Legal Opinion

Works v. Tiber

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 19, 1926No. Nos. 25,484, 25,485PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibeud, J.

Action for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of land by the defendants to one Mott which contract was assigned by Mott to the plaintiff. Upon the motion of the defendants Mott and one Honn were made parties. Honn and the plaintiff appeal separately from the order.

The two appellants filed a cost bond, not a supersedeas. The case proceeded to trial and resulted in judgment in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff and Honn. This was the situation when the appeal was heard.

It was for the plaintiff and Honn, if they desired to stay further proceedings pending the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barnes v. MacKenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Blythe v. KujawaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Doyle v. RiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. Sprenger v. JacobsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API