Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Henlen
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 11, 1989No. 56 W.D. Appeal Docket 1988PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
We are asked to consider whether a violation of the Pennsylvania Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Act of 1978 1 , (hereinafter “Act”) has occurred under the following novel circumstances.
Following a theft of an inmate’s personal property at the Mercer County Jail, Trooper James D. Dibler of the Pennsylvania State Police made arrangements to interview Appellant Thomas Dean Henlen in connection with said theft. Appellant, a guard at the prison, and considered a suspect in the case, was interviewed by Trooper Dibler at the Mercer County Jail on June 19, 1986 for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. CaceresSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commonwealth v. BlystoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Gunderman v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Blystone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Commonwealth v. HenlenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
3Cited by42 opinions
- Kelly v. Borough of CarlisleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Commonwealth v. BrionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Agnew v. DuplerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- PA State Police, Aplt. v. Grove, M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. HydeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.