Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Helm

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 28, 1936No. 8134Published

1DissentHaney, Circuit Judge

The parties hereto filed a stipulation with the clerk of the court below, which provided: “It Is Stipulated that the above entitled action may be dropped from the trial calendar to be restored upon notice of motion to be served upon counsel for the parties.”

The opinion herein followed Dillon v. United States (C.C.A.9) 29 F.(2d) 246. In that case there was a stipulation which was not filed, and the clerk therefore had no notice of pending proceedings. That case, therefore, is not in point.

I believe Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. MacGruer (C.C.A.9) 77 F.(2d) 83, to be directly in point.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dillon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. MacGruerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API