Chapman v. Crichet
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SMEDLEY, Commissioner.
On trial without a jury in district court, judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs in error against ’ defendant in error and A. R. McMahon jointly and severally for the amount of the principal, interest, and attorney’s fees due on five negotiable promissory notes, each in the sum of $500; and for foreclosure of a deed of trust lien on a tract of land in El Paso county. On appeal by defendant in error only the Court of Civil Appeals reformed the judgment of the district court by eliminating the part of it that imposed personal liability upon defendant in error. 63…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Holland v. NimitzTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Hill v. HoeldtkeTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Miller v. HodgesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Otto v. Halff & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
- Martin v. DialTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.