Legal Opinion

State v. Warren

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1985No. 8531PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIVINS, Judge.

Following denial of defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence, the parties stipulated to the facts and to defendant’s right to appeal the order denying his motion. Pursuant to the stipulation, defendant was convicted of possession of cocaine after a bench trial. He now appeals from the judgment, sentence and denial of his motion to suppress.

ISSUES:

Defendant raises the following issues on appeal:

1) Whether the arresting officer, Lt. Casey, had probable cause to believe that defendant was committing a misdemean- or in the officer’s presence;

2) If Lt. Casey had…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Miller v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. BoeglinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Robinson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. UriosteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. SalasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. State v. OchoaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. GreyeyesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API