Legal Opinion

State v. Ochoa

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 2008No. 30,016PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAES, Justice.

{1} Defendant, Julian Ochoa, has appealed a district court decision denying his motion to suppress evidence discovered after Defendant was stopped for a seatbelt violation then arrested on outstanding warrants. Defendant argued to the district court that the stop was pretextual because the officer who reported the seatbelt violation wanted Defendant stopped so the officer could question Defendant in relation to a drug trafficking investigation. Defendant asserted that article II, section 10 of the New Mexico Constitution prohibits pretextual stops. The Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. UriosteNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. VandenbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. City of Santa Fe v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. SlaytonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. MarquezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. HarrisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API