Legal Opinion
MacK v. Dailey
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 17, 1924No. 75PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff, a resident of the state of Michigan, brought this action against the defendant, a resident of the state of New York, to recover the sum of $20,001.56, with interest thereon from September 18, 1920. The case was submitted to a jury, and a verdict was rendered for the defendant of no cause of action.
The action was brought to recover upon a negotiable promissory note made on September 18, 1920, and delivered to the payee A. W. Wallace & Co.. The complaint alleged that this note was indorsed over to the plaintiff before its maturity, and for a good and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Shaw v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Murray v. LardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Commissioners of Marion County v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Goodman v. SimondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Hull v. . LittauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commercial Trust Co. of New Jersey v. KealeyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Chih C. A. Chen and Shen H. C. Lin v. Keith Nelson and Deborah NelsonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
- Stolte v. Securian Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Werger v. Frederick Lee Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949