Laura Larson v. Warner Bros Entertainment, Inc
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Defendants Warner Brothers Entertainment, Inc. and DC Comics (collectively, “DC”) appeal the district judge’s grant of summary judgment to Plaintiff Laura Sie-gel Larson as to DC’s third and fourth counterclaims (which, both parties concede, are governed by California law). 1 The district judge entered judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), and we have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reverse and remand as to these counterclaims.
The district judge erred in granting summary judgment to Larson as to DC’s third and fourth counterclaims. The central…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bustamante v. Intuit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Robinson & Wilson, Inc. v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Harris v. Rudin, Richman & AppelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Patel v. LiebermenschCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Ulloa v. McMillin Real Estate & Mortgage, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- DC Comics v. Pacific Pictures Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Ray Charles Foundation v. RobinsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Mapp v. UMG Recordings, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2018
- Champlin v. Music Sales CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Everly v. EverlyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.