Legal Opinion

Laura Larson v. Warner Bros Entertainment, Inc

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 10, 2013No. 11-55863, 11-56034UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Defendants Warner Brothers Entertainment, Inc. and DC Comics (collectively, “DC”) appeal the district judge’s grant of summary judgment to Plaintiff Laura Sie-gel Larson as to DC’s third and fourth counterclaims (which, both parties concede, are governed by California law). 1 The district judge entered judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), and we have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reverse and remand as to these counterclaims.

The district judge erred in granting summary judgment to Larson as to DC’s third and fourth counterclaims. The central…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bustamante v. Intuit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Robinson & Wilson, Inc. v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Harris v. Rudin, Richman & AppelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Patel v. LiebermenschCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Ulloa v. McMillin Real Estate & Mortgage, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. DC Comics v. Pacific Pictures Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
  2. Ray Charles Foundation v. RobinsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
  3. Mapp v. UMG Recordings, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2018
  4. Champlin v. Music Sales CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  5. Everly v. EverlyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API