Legal Opinion

Jimmie McCoy, III v. Warden Christe Quick, et al.

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 23, 2026No. 6:24-cv-00349Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA JIMMIE McCOy, III, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 24-CV-349-RAW-JAR WARDEN CHRISTE QUICK, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Jimmie McCoy, III (“McCoy”), appearing pro se and proceeding in forma pauperis, brings this federal civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. 1. Before the court is Defendants Quick, Harman, Moony, Fuller and Ross’s Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”). Dkt. 26. McCoy did not file a response. After careful review, the Court finds that the Motion should be denied. BACKGROUND McCoy is…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API