Legal Opinion

Walker v. Ferguson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 12, 1928PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, C. J.

On May 24, 1926, the appellees brought suit in equity against the appellants to cancel a deed by appellant road district to appellee Ferguson, and also to redeem the lands embraced in the complaint from the t)ax sale, if it should be held that the sale was valid. The suit was defended on the ground that the sale was valid and that the appellees’ time for redemption had expired.

The facts necessary to a decision of the issues raised by the appeal may be briefly stated as follows: Road Improvement District No. 9 of Grant County, Arkansas, was duly organized under the provisions of what is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Board of Comm'rs of Tippecanoe Cty. v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Pace v. WightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Adkin v. PillenMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. State ex rel. Western Land Ass'n v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  5. St. Louis Refrigerator & Wooden Gutter Co. v. LangleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wood v. LovettSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Anglo California National Bank of San Francisco v. LelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. City of Billings v. OstenMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Grieb, County Clerk v. Natl. Bank of Ky.'s Rec.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  5. Gartner v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API