Legal Opinion
Aktiebolaget M. Bank v. A.M.M. Ins. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 24, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff has recovered four judgments upon four marine insurance policies issued respectively by the American Merchant Marine Insurance Company, the Federal Insurance Company, the AEtna Insurance Company, and the National Fire and Marine Insurance Company. The four actions were tried together with five others before the court, without a jury. The policies covered the steamship Ada against war risks, and are substantially similar in form. The issues in all the actions are the same, with the exception of the one against the National Fire and Marine Insurance Company. The policy in that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. of NJ v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Queen Insurance Co. of America v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Johnson v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1811
- Burgess v. Equitable Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Snyder v. . Atlantic Mutual Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Calmar Steamship Corp. v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Hyman v. Sun Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Baker Castor Oil Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Calmar S. S. Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- Baker Castor Oil Co. v. Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.