Legal Opinion

Calmar S. S. Corp. v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 25, 1951PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYAN, District Judge.

These two suits brought in the admiralty by Calmar Steamship Corporation, as owner of the S.S. Portmar, arise out of the voyage of that vessel from San Francisco which began on November 28, 1941. On that voyage she was damaged by Japanese air attacks while in the Timor Sea on February 15 and 16, 1942, and in the harbor of Port Darwin, Australia, on February 19, 1942, she was subsequently beached after these attacks near Darwin.

The suits were tried together and the findings of fact hereinafter made and the conclusions of law reached are to be applied to both suits.

The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matson Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Standard Oil Co. of NJ v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. United States v. SheaSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. O'BRIEN v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Bradlie v. the Maryland Insurance CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1838

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Calmar Steamship Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Calmar Steamship Corp. v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Republic of China v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1957
  4. Calmar S. S. Corp. v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  5. Kowtko v. Delaware and Hudson Railroad Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API