Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania State Police v. McGill
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 8, 2014PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
President Judge PELLEGRINI.
The Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) and Municipal Police Officers’ Education and Training Commission (MPOETC) appeal a determination of the Office of Open Records (OOR) ordering the PSP to disclose to Andrew McGill (McGill) and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (collectively, Re-questers) the names of all police officers accredited by the MPOETC and their departments, but with the names of officers conducting undercover and covert operations redacted. For the reasons that fol*478low, we reverse the OOR’s Final Determination.
I
A
On February 11, 2013, McGill, on behalf…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Office of the Governor v. ScolforoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Moore v. OFFICE OF OPEN RECORDSCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Hodges v. Pennsylvania Department of HealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth, Department of Environmental Protection v. ColeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Office of the District Attorney of Philadelphia v. BagwellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- PA State Police, Aplt. v. Grove, M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- PA Dept. of Ed. v. R. Bagwell PSU v. R. BagwellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Office of the Governor v. R.H. Davis, Jr.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Pennsylvania State Police v. GroveCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.