Legal Opinion
Totedo v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 23, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-2366PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MENCER, District Judge.
On November 5, 1986, the plaintiff, Tote-do, filed a complaint against the defendant, Bankers Life and Casualty Company (Bankers Life), demanding reinstatement under an insurance policy. In April, 1987, the parties filed stipulations to all the material facts. In July, 1987, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment which are now pending before this court.
Stipulated Facts
Totedo was involved in an automobile accident on April 13, 1983 in which he in eurred severe injuries. At the time of the accident, Totedo was covered by a Catastrophic…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- John K. Rains v. Cascade Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Collister v. Nationwide Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. ElitzkySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Tonkovic v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ChristopherDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. American Community Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. American Community Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993