Legal Opinion

Cardinal Publishing Co. v. City of Madison

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The sufficiency of the complaint is challenged on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. This claim is based principally upon the proposition that the allegation contained in the complaint that the property of plaintiff company is devoted primarily to the publication of the Daily Cardinal is not sufficient to bring it within the exempt class provided for in sec. 70.11 (4), Stats., which provides that “Personal property owned by any religious, scientific, literary, educational or benevolent association . . . which is used exclusively for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gymnastic Ass'n of the South Side of Milwaukee v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Northwestern Publishing House v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Catholic Woman's Club v. City of Green BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hazen v. National Rifle Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. Deutsches Land, Inc. v. City of GlendaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Trustees of Clinton Lodge No. 152 v. Rock CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Alonzo Cudworth Post No. 23 v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 180 v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API