Commonwealth v. Heaney
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County
1Opinion of the Court
MOTTO, P.J.,
Before the court for *73disposition is the Commonwealth’s motion to disqualify counsel from joint representation of the co-defendants in the three cases before the court. The dispositive issues are whether the representation of multiple co-defendants within a single, consolidated prosecution is a conflict of interest, per se, and whether such multiple representations acts to a detriment to each client individually.
On or about June 23, 2014 the defendants in the above cases were charged by the New Castle Police Department as conspirators and co-defendants in the “Schmidt heroin…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. John VoigtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.