Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Heaney

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County

Decided February 23, 2015No. 704 of 2014, CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MOTTO, P.J.,

Before the court for *73disposition is the Commonwealth’s motion to disqualify counsel from joint representation of the co-defendants in the three cases before the court. The dispositive issues are whether the representation of multiple co-defendants within a single, consolidated prosecution is a conflict of interest, per se, and whether such multiple representations acts to a detriment to each client individually.

On or about June 23, 2014 the defendants in the above cases were charged by the New Castle Police Department as conspirators and co-defendants in the “Schmidt heroin…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. John VoigtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API