Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 17, 1986PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*693The plaintiffs’ decedent, Robert Burgess, was born severely impaired as a result of alleged medical malpractice and negligence during the course of the infant’s delivery. The plaintiff mother, Ida Burgess, asserts various causes of action on behalf of the decedent and herself, including a claim for the emotional injuries suffered by her in consequence of witnessing the tragic results of the difficult and unsuccessful delivery. This latter cause of action, which the appellants seek to dismiss, is asserted by the plaintiffs to be cognizable under a "zone of danger” theory (Bovsun v Sanperi, 61…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Tobin v. GrossmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Bovsun v. SanperiNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Howard v. LecherNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Endresz v. FriedbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Keselman v. Kingsboro Medical GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. James v. Middletown Community Health Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Bauch v. VerrilliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Miller v. ChalomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Stiles v. SenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API