Legal Opinion

Katz's Estate

Pennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County

Decided February 11, 1937No. 69 of 1936Published

1Opinion of the Court

Bok, J.,

— We might spend fruitless time discussing whether a contract existed in this case. That is less a question than the right of a decedent to make a contract binding his executors to employ a lawyer of his own choosing to represent them.

Mr. Hassler was employed to draw a will and did so with considerable labor. The auditing judge evaluated this work and allowed him $400; this was a matter of discretion and we see no abuse of it. The estate’s contention that Mr. Hassler’s acceptance of $10 was an accord and satisfaction is wayward, for the evidence shows clearly that he took it on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In re Estate of OgierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Huffman v. HuffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. In Re the Accounting of CaldwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Pickett's WillOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Williams v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API