Legal Opinion
Hernandez v. Fischer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 13, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to petitioner’s contention, his plea of guilty to possessing tattoo equipment “precludes any challenge to that portion of the determination” (Matter of Spencer v Goord, 38 AD3d 1028, 1028 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 802 [2007]; see Matter of Linnen v Prack, 92 AD3d 986, 987 [2012], lv dismissed 20 NY3d 905 [2012]). As for the weapons possession charge, respondent correctly concedes that it must be annulled due to the unjustified refusal of correction officials to permit petitioner to observe the search of his cell (see Matter of Morales v Fischer, 89 AD3d 1346, 1347 [2011]). Inasmuch as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morales v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Linnen v. PrackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Dawes v. VenettozziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Spencer v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Johnson v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Watson v. New York State Department of Corrections & Community SupervisionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Watson v. New York State Department of Corrections & Community SupervisionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013