Legal Opinion

State v. Dalton

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 8, 2008No. 99,111PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, J.:

In this sentencing appeal, William J. Dalton claims he should have a shorter sentence because possessing red phosphorus with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine is the same conduct that is prohibited by the less severe offense of using drug paraphernalia. According to a ruling by our Supreme Court, if the same conduct is prohibited by two statutes and those statutes have different levels of punishment, a defendant can be convicted of either crime, but the court can only impose the sentence of the less severe level. Because we do not think the two statutes here are identical, we…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BryanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
  4. State v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  5. State v. SpanglerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SnellingsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  3. State v. SnellingsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API