United States v. $155,900.00 United States Currency
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) NO. 3:20-cv-00879 ) JUDGE RICHARDSON $155,900.00 UNITED STATES ) CURRENCY, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 12, “Motion”) against would-be claimant Delandzro Lewis, to which no response has been timely filed. If no response is timely filed, a motion shall be deemed to be unopposed. Local Rule 7.01 (a)(3). In addition, if a timely response to a moving party’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miller v. Shore Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Mullenix v. Eastman Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2017
- United States v. $39,000.00 in U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020