Legal Opinion

Hickox v. Holladay

United States Circuit Court

Decided December 14, 1886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion for Order of Sale to Satisfy Decree.

1Opinion of the CourtDeady, J.

On June 14, 1886,2 this court adjudged and made a decree in this cause to the effect (1) that a certain judgment obtained by the defendant Elliott in the supreme court of this state, on August 15, 1879, for the sum of $24,630.22, principal and costs, against Ben Holladay, and then amounting, with interest, to the sum of $38,975.62, does, by virtue of a certain assignment of February 13, 1874, from Elliott to the plaintiif, Hickox, in consideration of the sum of $14,979.85 advanced to the former by Martin White on the security thereof, belong to Hickox, in trust for White, subject to a claim…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wiswall v. SampsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  2. Chautauque County Bank v. . RisleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Roberts v. SutherlinOregon Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Ellicott v. United States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1848
  5. In re Estes & CarterDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grosscup v. German Savings & Loan SocietyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1908
  2. Mercantile Trust Co. v. Sunset Road Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Decker Bros. v. Berner's Bay Mining Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API