Legal Opinion

The Alfonso

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 15, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

My decision in this ease is that the libels should be dismissed, but, of course, without costs.

I. These five cases involve penalties sought to be recovered from the several steamships named therein, for the alleged breach of section 10 of the Immigration Aet of 1917, as amended by section 27 of the Immigration Aet of 1924, now title 8, U. 8. Code, § 146 (8 USCA § 146), in that certain through passengers, who were on board the vessels when they touched at the port of New York — bound in nil cases but one from Mexican and Cuban ports to ports in Spain, and in that one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Dollar S. S. Line v. EltingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. Lloyd Sabaudo Societa Anonima Per Azioni v. EltingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930
  4. The BremenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. New York & Porto Rico S. S. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  2. United States v. Osaka Shosen Kaisha LineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  3. United States v. Compania TransatlanticaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API