Legal Opinion
Lloyd Sabaudo Societa Anonima Per Azioni v. Elting
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 2, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The complaint contains fifteen causes of action, to recover fifteen fines paid under protest by the plaintiff, á steamship company, to the defendant, collector of customs of the port of New York. The fines were imposed by the Secretary of Labor, at various times from 1923 to 1926, under the provisions of 8 USCA § 145. The first two sentences of this section read as follows:
“It shall be unlawful for any person, including any transportation company other than railway lines entering the United States from foreign contiguous territory, or the owner, master, agent, or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- United States Ex Rel. Powlowec v. DayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Navigazione Libera Triestina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- Dollar S. S. Line v. HydeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Compagnie Generale Transatlantique v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- North German Lloyd v. EltingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Dollar S. S. Line v. EltingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Rederiaktiebolaget Nordstjernen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- The AlfonsoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931