Legal Opinion

Martin v. City of Indianapolis

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided October 3, 1997No. IP 96-0330-C-B/SPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BARKER, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby denies Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and grants Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

Plaintiff, Jan Randolph Martin (“Martin”), is an artist who resides in Indianapolis. See Complnt. ¶ 1. Defendant, the City of Indianapolis (the “City”), is a municipal…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Bank Leumi Le-Israel, B.M., a Foreign Corporation v. Dennis Lee, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Nancy Wolf v. City of Fitchburg and G. Jean SeilingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jan Randolph Martin, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. City of Indianapolis, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  2. Kuryakyn Holdings, LLC v. Ciro, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2017
  3. MG Design Associates, Corp. v. CoStar Realty Information, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  4. Scott v. DixonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
  5. Fleurimond v. New York UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API