Legal Opinion

Universal Film Mfg. Co. v. Copperman

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 15, 1914PublishedCited by 22 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Universal Film Manufacturing Company against S. Copperman and others on a copyright of a motion picture photo play. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

HOUGH, District Judge.

Prior to September, 1912, the Nordisk Films Company manufactured or created a motion picture photo play known as “The Great Circus Catastrophe.” The photographs on the film tell a story which was originally shown by human actors who played their parts before a camera, so that the photo play (i. e., the story told by the photographs successively shown to the audience) is a pantomime drama. The Nordisk Company is a Danish corporation; this work was done in Denmark. In that and other countries of Europe it was in 1912 lawful to copyright photo plays, but no copyright was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Werckmeister v. American Lithographic Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. Ralph A. Freundlich, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  2. Heim v. Universal Pictures Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. DeSilva Construction Corp. v. HerraldDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1962
  4. Gardenia Flowers, Inc. v. Joseph Markovits, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  5. Basevi v. Edward O'Toole Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API